Comparison

Best B2B appointment setting companieschecked against their own sites

Short answer

There is no single best, because the six companies below sell four different things: meetings, a system, rented people, or a fixed monthly lead volume. Only three publish a headline price. CIENCE publishes the most detail, Cleverly publishes a full range rather than a floor, and Belkins publishes a starting figure with no billing period attached to it. A fourth, SalesBread, names a figure only inside an FAQ answer. Martal Group and WeeGrow publish no figure anywhere. Decide which of the four shapes you are buying first, because that narrows the list faster than any price does.

Written by WeeGrow, and WeeGrow is on the list, so read it with that in mind. Every competitor fact on this page was read off that company’s own website on 26 September 2026and nothing is taken from another roundup. Where a company publishes nothing, the row says “not published” rather than guessing. All names are trademarks of their owners and appear here for factual comparison only.

What each one publishes

CIENCE (graph8)
$7,499 first month, all in
Cleverly
$697 to $2,997 / month
Belkins
from $5,000, no period stated
SalesBread
2-3k/month, in an FAQ only
Martal Group
Not published
WeeGrow
Not published, quoted per scope
The one roundups get wrongquoted verbatim
“The average starter price: from $5,000”

Source: belkins.io, checked 26 September 2026. Note what is missing: no billing period is attached to that figure anywhere on the page. It is widely repeated elsewhere as a monthly retainer figure, which their own site does not say.

01The list

Six companies, every fact read off their own site

The problem with this category is not that the companies are bad. It is that the roundups ranking them recycle each other, and prices drift from vendor page to blog post to listicle until a figure nobody published becomes the number everyone quotes. So here is the rule for this page: if the company does not say it on its own website, it is not on this page. Where a company publishes nothing on a subject, the row says so.

What they actually sell
Meetings bought against an annual appointment target. Their pricing page frames three named packages by "Yearly appointments": "30+" on "For small business", "100+" on "Growth" and "200+" on "Growth Plus", with an "Enterprise" tier above them.
Channels
Their appointment setting page splits the list in two. Under "Outbound channels": "Email outreach", "LinkedIn outreach" and "Cold calling". Under "Follow-up add-ons": "Intent-based calling" and "Messengers (WhatsApp and SMS)", plus "+ On-demand inbound appointment channels".
Published price
"The average starter price: from $5,000", printed beside "1,500 leads/month", "3 outreach channels" and "100 guaranteed appts/year". No billing period is attached to the figure anywhere on the page.
Published commitment
No contract length is published. Their pricing page calls these "monthly retainer packages" while the targets on them are counted as "Yearly appointments", and only the Enterprise tier mentions terms at all: "Custom SLAs and contract terms tailored to enterprise procurement".

What other roundups leave out

The appointment target is annual while the retainer is monthly. Comparing their starter figure to anyone else's monthly fee is not like for like until you ask what period that figure covers and how many appointments come with it.

CIENCE (graph8)

cience.com/pricing
What they actually sell
A built revenue system plus optional rented SDR capacity. CIENCE now sits inside the graph8 group alongside the graph8 platform and Tenbound.
Channels
Email, phone, LinkedIn, SMS and WhatsApp through the graph8 sequencer, plus inbound routing and AI voice agents.
Published price
Published in full: "GTM setup" at "$5,000" one-time, "Performance-Driven Growth" at "$2,000 /mo", "Platform license" at "$499 /mo", and "$7,499" as the stated "First month, all in".
Published commitment
No minimum term stated. The page describes "month-to-month strategic execution", and says SDR capacity is optional and priced separately "so teams can add coverage without a long-term contract".

What other roundups leave out

They publish what an SDR costs by region and seniority: three levels, each priced separately for "Offshore", "Europe" and "US" delivery, plus "SDR onboarding and recruitment" at "$1,000 one-time per SDR". No other company on this list shows you that line item.

Martal Group

martal.ca/pricing
What they actually sell
Tiered outsourced sales teams. The lowest tier is outbound lead generation; the higher tiers add sales execution and onboarding, so they sell closing capacity, not only meetings.
Channels
Email, LinkedIn and calls, plus inbound lead qualification and sales training as separate lines.
Published price
Not published. Their pricing page names the structure only: "flat fee per month" for the entry tier, and "flat fee per month + sales commission" for the two tiers above it.
Published commitment
Published under "Contract duration" as a pilot: "3 Month Pilot Campaign" then "Monthly Subscription after the Pilot Campaign" on the entry tier, and "4 Month Pilot Campaign" then "Monthly Subscription after the Pilot Campaign" on the two tiers above.

What other roundups leave out

The upper tiers add a sales commission on top of the retainer. That changes the question from what the monthly fee is to what share of closed revenue you are comfortable paying, which is a very different negotiation.

What they actually sell
A productized outbound service with a dedicated rep attached. Retainer based rather than paid per appointment.
Channels
LinkedIn, cold email and cold calling, with outsourced SDRs and paid ads sold separately elsewhere on the site.
Published price
A full range, not a floor: "Cleverly's B2B appointment setting services range from $697–$2,997/month depending on your outreach channels, targeting needs, and campaign scope."
Published commitment
Not published for this service. Their page does state a ramp expectation: "Most clients see their first confirmed meeting within two to four weeks of launch."

What other roundups leave out

Theirs is the only headline price here that names a ceiling as well as an entry point, so you can see the whole band before you get on a call. Their separate LinkedIn page publishes a lower entry figure for a narrower service: "LinkedIn lead generation services with Cleverly start at $397 per month."

What they actually sell
A fixed volume of qualified leads per month from manual, heavily researched outreach, with appointment setting as an option on top.
Channels
LinkedIn and email only. No cold calling is offered.
Published price
No headline price, and none anywhere on their homepage. One FAQ answer on their LinkedIn service page names a figure in passing: "2-3k/month", written without a currency symbol, under the question "What is the monthly investment and what does the ramp-up time look like?"
Published commitment
Their homepage answers it directly: "It’s a month-to-month service. We keep clients by performance alone." The same page attaches money back to a volume target: "We’ll bring you 20+ sales qualified leads per month using ultra-personalized LinkedIn + email outreach, or your money back."

What other roundups leave out

They publish who they will refuse. Their LinkedIn service page asks three fit questions outright: "Do most of your prospects have an updated LinkedIn profile? Are there more than 200 companies worth targeting? Are you selling a 4 figure product or service?" Almost nobody else states a disqualifier in public.

WeeGrow

That’s us. Disclosure below.
What they actually sell
Done with you outbound. We build and run the engine alongside your team rather than sealing it off, and you keep everything that gets built.
Channels
LinkedIn first, with cold email and calling used to follow up rather than to open.
Published price
Not published, deliberately. We scope and quote each engagement after a free audit. That is a genuine disadvantage if you want to compare rate cards today.
Published commitment
Cancel any time after the first 90 days.

What other roundups leave out

We are the smallest team on this list. That is the point if you want direct access to the people running your campaigns, and it is the wrong answer if you need fifty seats dialling by Monday.

Two pages worth reading alongside this one: our breakdown of what B2B lead generation actually costs puts these figures against in-house and freelancer alternatives, and our head to head with Cleverly goes deeper on the one company here that publishes the most about its LinkedIn service.

02Side by side

The same five questions, asked of all six

Scroll the table sideways. Everything in the price and commitment columns is either a verbatim quote from the company’s own site or the words “not published”.

CompanyWhat they sellChannelsPublished pricePublished commitment
BelkinsMeetings bought against an annual appointment target. Their pricing page frames three named packages by "Yearly appointments": "30+" on "For small business", "100+" on "Growth" and "200+" on "Growth Plus", with an "Enterprise" tier above them.Their appointment setting page splits the list in two. Under "Outbound channels": "Email outreach", "LinkedIn outreach" and "Cold calling". Under "Follow-up add-ons": "Intent-based calling" and "Messengers (WhatsApp and SMS)", plus "+ On-demand inbound appointment channels"."The average starter price: from $5,000", printed beside "1,500 leads/month", "3 outreach channels" and "100 guaranteed appts/year". No billing period is attached to the figure anywhere on the page.No contract length is published. Their pricing page calls these "monthly retainer packages" while the targets on them are counted as "Yearly appointments", and only the Enterprise tier mentions terms at all: "Custom SLAs and contract terms tailored to enterprise procurement".
CIENCE (graph8)A built revenue system plus optional rented SDR capacity. CIENCE now sits inside the graph8 group alongside the graph8 platform and Tenbound.Email, phone, LinkedIn, SMS and WhatsApp through the graph8 sequencer, plus inbound routing and AI voice agents.Published in full: "GTM setup" at "$5,000" one-time, "Performance-Driven Growth" at "$2,000 /mo", "Platform license" at "$499 /mo", and "$7,499" as the stated "First month, all in".No minimum term stated. The page describes "month-to-month strategic execution", and says SDR capacity is optional and priced separately "so teams can add coverage without a long-term contract".
Martal GroupTiered outsourced sales teams. The lowest tier is outbound lead generation; the higher tiers add sales execution and onboarding, so they sell closing capacity, not only meetings.Email, LinkedIn and calls, plus inbound lead qualification and sales training as separate lines.Not published. Their pricing page names the structure only: "flat fee per month" for the entry tier, and "flat fee per month + sales commission" for the two tiers above it.Published under "Contract duration" as a pilot: "3 Month Pilot Campaign" then "Monthly Subscription after the Pilot Campaign" on the entry tier, and "4 Month Pilot Campaign" then "Monthly Subscription after the Pilot Campaign" on the two tiers above.
CleverlyA productized outbound service with a dedicated rep attached. Retainer based rather than paid per appointment.LinkedIn, cold email and cold calling, with outsourced SDRs and paid ads sold separately elsewhere on the site.A full range, not a floor: "Cleverly's B2B appointment setting services range from $697–$2,997/month depending on your outreach channels, targeting needs, and campaign scope."Not published for this service. Their page does state a ramp expectation: "Most clients see their first confirmed meeting within two to four weeks of launch."
SalesBreadA fixed volume of qualified leads per month from manual, heavily researched outreach, with appointment setting as an option on top.LinkedIn and email only. No cold calling is offered.No headline price, and none anywhere on their homepage. One FAQ answer on their LinkedIn service page names a figure in passing: "2-3k/month", written without a currency symbol, under the question "What is the monthly investment and what does the ramp-up time look like?"Their homepage answers it directly: "It’s a month-to-month service. We keep clients by performance alone." The same page attaches money back to a volume target: "We’ll bring you 20+ sales qualified leads per month using ultra-personalized LinkedIn + email outreach, or your money back."
WeeGrowDone with you outbound. We build and run the engine alongside your team rather than sealing it off, and you keep everything that gets built.LinkedIn first, with cold email and calling used to follow up rather than to open.Not published, deliberately. We scope and quote each engagement after a free audit. That is a genuine disadvantage if you want to compare rate cards today.Cancel any time after the first 90 days.

All rows checked 26 September 2026. Prices and terms change without notice, so confirm directly before you sign anything.

03The framework

Five questions that decide this, in order

Ask these five in this sequence, of every vendor on your shortlist, and write the answers down. The order matters: question one changes what the other four mean. We use the same five internally when a prospect asks us to compare ourselves to someone else.

Q1

What exactly am I buying: meetings, a system, people, or a fixed volume of leads?

A good answer sounds like

The answer names one of the four without hedging, and the contract is written in that unit.

Why it decides things

These four things are priced and judged completely differently. Buying meetings means you are paying for an outcome and should be arguing about the qualification bar. Buying a system means you are paying for an asset and should be arguing about who owns it afterwards. Buying people means you are renting capacity and should be arguing about ramp time and replacement. Buying a fixed volume of leads means you are paying per unit and should be arguing about what counts as one.

Q2

What does a qualified meeting mean in writing?

A good answer sounds like

A written definition with title, company size, budget signal and a no-show policy attached to it.

Why it decides things

Every company on this list will book you meetings. The difference between a good and a bad engagement is almost never volume, it is whether the meetings were with people who could buy. If the definition lives in a sales call and not in the contract, you will lose that argument in month three.

Q3

Who owns the domains, the data and the sequences when this ends?

A good answer sounds like

You do, in writing, including the sending infrastructure and the CRM records.

Why it decides things

Outbound builds real assets: warmed domains, a cleaned list, a message that works. If those sit in the vendor's account, your second year starts from zero and your switching cost is enormous. Ask before you sign, not at the exit interview.

Q4

What is the total first-year number, not the monthly one?

A good answer sounds like

Setup, retainer, platform fees, data costs, any commission and the minimum term, added up.

Why it decides things

Published figures on this page range from a floor with no period attached to a full first-month total. Three of the six publish no headline price at all, one of those three names a figure only inside an FAQ answer, and one of the six adds commission on closed revenue above the retainer. Only a first-year total makes them comparable.

Q5

Who is actually doing the work, and can I speak to them before I sign?

A good answer sounds like

A named person, their seniority, their region, and how many other accounts they carry.

Why it decides things

The gap between the person who sells the engagement and the person who writes your messages is where most outbound disappointment lives. One company on this list publishes SDR rates by region and seniority, which at least makes the question answerable. Ask everyone else the same thing.

Question one is the one people skip. If you are actually buying people rather than meetings, read how an outsourced SDR engagement is structured instead, because the economics and the ramp are completely different. If you are buying a system, the honest version of that is documented on our appointment setting service page, and you can sanity check any vendor’s numbers against your own deal size with the pipeline ROI calculator.

04The honest part

When you should not hire any of these companies

No roundup ever says this, because every roundup in this category is written by someone with a referral link. So here it is. There are four situations where a retainer with any company on this page, including us, will convert your budget into calendar invites nobody wants.

You have not closed the same deal twice the same way

Outbound scales a repeatable motion. It does not discover one. If you cannot describe the last two wins in the same sentence, you are paying an agency to run experiments you could run yourself for the cost of a list and a fortnight of your own time.

Your total addressable market is under a few hundred accounts

At that size the list is not a list, it is a relationship map. Volume outreach burns through it in weeks and you cannot get those accounts back. Run it yourself, slowly, or treat it as an account based programme rather than an outbound one.

Your deal size cannot absorb a four-figure monthly retainer

Market rates for a done for you agency sit roughly between $1,500 and $5,000+ per month, with freelancers at $500 to $1,500 and self-run software at $50 to $150 per seat. If a won deal is worth less than a couple of months of retainer, the maths only works at volumes this model rarely produces.

Nobody on your side can run the meetings that get booked

The most expensive failure in outbound is a full calendar and no closer. Meetings decay fast. If your founder is already at capacity and there is no second seller, book the capacity problem first and the pipeline problem second.

If two or more of those describe you, the sensible next step is not a shortlist. It is running one channel yourself for a quarter and fixing the offer, the list and the follow-up before you pay anyone a retainer. Our LinkedIn lead generation page walks through what that looks like when you do it in-house, including the plumbing you need in place first so the meetings you do get are not lost in a spreadsheet.

05Honest fit

Which of these fits which kind of team

Pick one of the others if

  • You need real volume across three or more channels at once: Belkins and CIENCE are both built for that and we are not
  • You want every line item published before the first call: CIENCE publishes the most detail of anyone here, down to SDR rates by region
  • You want a known ceiling on the monthly spend before you commit: Cleverly publishes the only headline price here that names a ceiling as well as an entry point
  • You want closing capacity and not only meetings, and commission on revenue suits you: that is Martal Group's upper tiers
  • You want a published volume promise with money back attached, on LinkedIn and email only: that is SalesBread's homepage model

Pick WeeGrow if

  • Your buyers are genuinely on LinkedIn and you want that channel run deeply rather than blasted across five
  • You want a done with you engagement where your team learns the motion, not a sealed black box
  • You want a scoped quote and a named team, and you are willing to take a call to get the number
  • You want to own the domains, data, sequences and CRM records that get built
  • You want every reply qualified before it reaches your calendar

The disclosure again, because it matters: we wrote this and we are on it. WeeGrow was founded by Asfand, who spent 8+ years leading B2B sales and was most recently Head of Corporate Sales at InvoZone, with $30M+ in cumulative closed revenue and enterprise deals up to $3M+ across SaaS, technology, fintech, healthcare and telecom. We publish no rate card, which is a fair thing to hold against us if you are comparing on price today. What you get instead is a written scope and a price before you commit, and a straight answer if we think one of the other five is the better fit.

06FAQ

Choosing between them, answered

  • There is no single best, because the six on this page sell genuinely different things. Belkins sells meetings against an annual appointment target. CIENCE sells a built revenue system with optional rented SDR capacity. Martal Group sells tiered sales teams where the upper tiers add commission. Cleverly sells a productized retainer with a published range. SalesBread sells a fixed monthly lead volume from LinkedIn and email only. WeeGrow, who wrote this page, sells a done with you engagement scoped after a free audit. Those six offerings come down to four shapes: meetings, a system, rented people, or a fixed volume of leads. Decide which shape you are buying before you shortlist anyone.